--

This is excellent. But I've reported this bot and I'm told I'm not the first. https://medium.com/@mdoe06581

Why is 'she' still publishing 100% AI content behind a paywall, following the maximum number of people every day, 20 AI stories daily on the same topic with the same picture. A very systematic approach, and has not been suspended?

Also, if you want to focus on quality, it would make sense to limit the number of paywalled stories published to 3 absolute maximum! Because seriously, any bot (or human) publishing 20 stories a day, like this one, is not focusing on quality.

Also, if you want to stop inauthentic engagement and growth hacking, wouldn't it make sense to stop people from following a disproportionately high number of people compared to the number of people following them? Twitter blocks this type of growth hacking beyond certain limits.

Also, what about inauthentic mass tagging? Let's get that abolished please. That's driving people to get others to view their stories, without writing anything decent, or anything worth reading.

And because the whole page hangs when people use so many tags, it's actually not possible to leave a comment on some of them to ask them to stop this bad practice. 5 tags is plenty.

--

--

Susie Kearley 🐹 Guinea pig slave
Susie Kearley 🐹 Guinea pig slave

Written by Susie Kearley 🐹 Guinea pig slave

Freelance journalist UK. Published in BBC Countryfile, The Mirror, Britain mag etc. Covers writing, health, psychology, memoir, current affairs, & environment.

Responses (3)